ABCs of Death 2 (2014)

i loved the first one ; so disappointed in the second chapter. just one or two stories among the 26 are good. It s warning for those who really enjoyed the first one .I feel like i lost my time watching it. i loved the first one ; so disappointed in the second chapter. just one or two stories among the 26 are good. It s warning for those who really enjoyed the first one .I feel like i lost my time watching it. i loved the first one ; so disappointed in the second chapter. just one or two stories among the 26 are good. It s warning for those who really enjoyed the first one .I feel like i lost my time watching it. i loved the first one ; so disappointed in the second chapter. just one or two stories among the 26 are good. It s warning for those who really enjoyed the first one .I feel like i lost my time watching it.

Fmovies: I really fell for the concept when the first film came out, despite the fact that many of the shorts were complete rubbish... the gems that one finds along the way is prize enough though (Dogfight, Vagitus or XXL just to name a few).

The second one has a new tune and intro (great, both of them) and a more consistent quality throughout the 2 hours of film. Apart from "P", which is the biggest pile of boring *** that I've ever seen, all are at least watchable. Funnily enough, it seems that there are less gold segments than in ABC 1. I'd take the first one.

I do think that the screening process should be a bit more severe. I simply cannot believe that some of the letters were considered good enough to be part of the anthology, even considering personal taste/arty concepts/etc.

In any case, you gotta admire these guys who are pushing in their concept despite its unconventionality; just for that I'll be buying the film!

The legacy continuous. The movie is filled with some of the most creepy, disturbing and gory moments and a moral at the end of each story which doesn't make sense most of the times but it stills keeps your mind thinking about what did the director intented to convey int he 1st place . Filled with surrealism and body horror. Watch it after you have watched your appetite.

ABCs of Death 2 fmovies. A less cheesy and sillier and more ambitiously impressive sequel that feels like a short film showcase that can mostly be developed into a bigger and better feature film. The segments Y and Z alone are just outstanding and wickedly funny and gory and they are one of the best horror short films I have ever seen. Again, this film still has everything that horror fans will enjoy such as weird twisted gory ones like D and J segments, a creative way of death like segment H, sick bloody wicked funny ones like A, G, O, U, I segments and even bizarrely disturbing ones in S, T, X segments. However, most of them seem to be made so well that they might expect some big movie company would pick their shorts up to continue it as a feature film or future their directing career which is good, but at the moment it also feels kind of incomplete and not fully understandable enough and it just ends there leaving the audience lingering for more. The GORES here are still over the top and impressively done as well as bizarrely creative overall but still not as cheesy and outrageous as the first film. Some of the segments also has thrills and SCARES going on as well but nothing that will guaranteed nightmares. Overall, this is a well-made and ambitious sequel that may not surpass the first film's cheesy FUN but definitely is an upgrade in its quality. >>B+<<

I liked the original ABCs of Death. I loved the idea, and have seen quite a few of the directors' work. Unfortunately, it seems some of the directors approached didn't get the memo, and gave very little effort in their submissions. G for Gravity and M for Miscarriage spring to mind. Then you have your wild/crazy efforts like F,J,W and Z which I wasted minutes of my life watching.

The good news is that the ABCs of Death 2 is far more consistent in the quality. It starts strong with 'A' by E.L.Katz, an amusing tale of a hit-gone-wrong (or has it?) and carried on with great gusto and a well-paced mix of both fun ('B') and dread ('C' and 'D'). In fact, by the time you get to 'Q' during the second half of the film, the quality is almost totally improved and maintains a high level until the film ends.

And what an ending.

'Z' is not just (in my humble opinion) the best short film of the bunch, but also one of the best short films I've ever seen. I wouldn't eat during this one if I were you, and I'd turn all the lights out as well. Be prepared to be thoroughly shocked. It's not quite as disgusting as 'L for Libido' from the first film (my favourite short of that bunch), but is a quite unique take on motherhood and features some quite remarkable, and disgusting, special effects, all of which I think I believe were done by the director in his own living room!

I'll summarise the Good, the Bad and the Ugly, so to speak:

The Great: AZ The very Good: BCFJKRSV The OK: DEGHIMNOQTUWXY The downright ugly: LP

So for your money, you get 2 excellent shorts, 2 awful ones, and the rest are all decent. That's a pretty good run for an anthology-style film like this, I think. :)

Where do i even start? Since the film itself never starts let alone finishes. Abc's of death 2 attempts to avoid all horror film cliché's but somehow manages to create new ones. The film is disgusting, a series of events that are so poorly executed by its lazy filming techniques and its embarrassingly low budget. The acting is horrific there were literally no effort put into this film which leaves me confused on how it eve made it to the big screen. Although i do have to admit it made slight improvements compared to the first film, which is one of my all time hated movies. The film was made for its shock factor as if it was a competition on which skit was capable of creating the most disgusting. You might as well stick to the human centipede franchise.