Star Trek Poster

Star Trek (2009)

Action | SciFi 
Rayting:   8.0/10 578.9K votes
Country: USA | Germany
Language: English
Release date: 7 May 2009

The brash James T. Kirk tries to live up to his father's legacy with Mr. Spock keeping him in check as a vengeful Romulan from the future creates black holes to destroy the Federation one planet at a time.

Movie Trailer

Where to Watch

User Reviews

anitsuj 7 October 2018

No spoilers here. I just want to say that this movie is, to put it nicely, horrendous. I don't really have much to say other than it is a complete waste of time. For me, this was written for a six to twelve year old audience. However, due to the level of violence, it has been rated outside of the audience I think this is aimed at. A lot of things were coincidental... unreal, and just plain silly. The writers need to work towards a much more mature and much more intelligent audience. This was very disappointing for me.

draedynkouper 29 March 2019

Fmovies: A.k.a. Mr Rip Off a.k.a. the most uncreative (so-called) director a.k.a. Mr reboot/remake/rip off strikes again!

He is a copycat with zero original or interesting bones in his body or anywhere near him. Seriously. He messed up Star Wars, but is it him or is he just a studio instrument who acts like it's him and it's us who keep feeding him? This film was boring, has no majesty, nothing new and the directing was obvious.

jason-2281 2 May 2009

Star Trek. When someone speaks this name, various images, ideas, characters and phrases come to mind. I know they certainly do with me. Characters such as Kirk, Spock, Picard, Data, Janeway, Seven of Nine; ideas like the prime directive; phrases like "Live long and Prosper", "Good God Jim, I'm a doctor not aÂ….". I wouldn't consider myself a "Trekkie", but I do have a deep affection for this series and world.

To my great delight, I was fortunate enough to see an advanced screening last night of JJ Abrams re-imaging of "Star Trek". I must admit that I was skeptical at first about taking such iconic characters and recasting them, even in younger iterations, because most people think of the characters of Kirk, Spock, Bones, Scotty, Uhura, Sulu and Chekov with the actors that originally portrayed them. These portrayals are engrained in the pop culture consciousness of the world and hence my skepticism arose. Fortunately, my doubts were unnecessary.

This is not your father's "Star Trek". From the moment the movie begins, so does the action and it never lets up. However, this movie has more than just incredible and intense action, it also pays homage to the series of old. Sure, they wanted to bring us a Trek for the 21st century, but they also realized that they needed to respect the source material and fans of a series that has been around more than 40 years. However, you don't need to know much about Star Trek to enjoy this movie. Each character has been given a background and history that lets you know a little something about each one. There's a lot to be told in an origin movie and it is handled deftly by both the writers and the director.

But, what really made the movies for me were the actors chosen to play these roles, especially Chris Pine as Kirk, Zachary Quinto as Spock and Karl Urban as Dr. McCoy, aka "Bones". This movie would not have worked if the casting of these three characters had not been spot on. Both Mr. Quinto and Urban uncannily channel their predecessors, Leonard Nimoy and DeForest Kelley. They took on some of their inflections, mannerisms and expressions to really give you a sense that they are just younger versions of the originals. Chris Pine, however, takes on the most memorable role in Trek history and makes it his own. This Kirk is not only the womanizer, lover, and captain that you already know, but as portrayed by Mr. Pine also has a swagger, bravado, intelligence, and is a complete adrenaline junkie. We could not have asked for a better Kirk in this movie.

They have laid a solid foundation for a new series, with new life, perfect cast and a director with a true vision. If the first movie can be this good, my expectations for further adventures have risen exponentially.

This is my first review for our website and as such might not be very good since I have no experience at writing reviews. I intentionally didn't reveal any plot points so as to not spoil anything for whoever may read this. I may in the future reveal areas that may have spoilers but mark these sections so you can skip over them. I'll be seeing Wolverine tomorrow and hope to have a review up by tomorrow night. Until we meet again, "Live long and Prosper!"

gnjuzpyr 16 December 2018

Star Trek fmovies. And gives the middle finger to the original concept of a universe.

Let me plain as day: this series should not have been rebooted so badly and so out of context and so against its original ideal and with such a cheap writing 'attempt.' It should not.

The generic and very stupid Mission Impossible (movies not the original serial) style action sequences are done so badly one wonders if they spent more than an hour on them. The effects look like they are done on a Commodore 128. The acting is so 'brats rock your world' tacky that prove Jar Jar here hates hates hates Gene Roddenberry.

There is no redemption for Abrams.

oqw-78850 28 August 2018

It is by Jar Jar Abrams. Please marketing people put his name/advertise his name on film posters and DVD covers prominently. people like me who like good films and entertainment can easily avoid and skip it that way. Jar Jar Abrams made Star Trek into a 'bad brat does good' typical Hollywood film

nyvajiwk 24 November 2017

I really enjoy the Star Trek TV series (original, TNG and DS9) and admit that I am late to this review. As much as I enjoy Star Trek and its ideals I had watched Star Wars The Force Awakens by JJ Abrams and I hated that. Star Wars rebooted with completely non-plot for pre-teens and one-liners, wise-cracks and plot holes so big that even Donald Trump's ego could drive through them was not for me.

So, anyway with a certain amount of hesitation I finally watched the reboot of Star Trek.... and it was as bad as I feared. Since it was expected I was not disappointed, but by gosh what is with the people who hire the director JJ Abrams? He makes every character a cartoon character. Never mind that the utopian and progressive society of the Federation is completely glossed over and ignored, but these characters with the formulaic backgrounds and corny lines and false tensions is just terrible. The Vulcans and Romulans' feud has never been as cliché-ridden I would say.

Look, I get it. People pay for reboots and remakes and sequels and so Hollywood serves them up (or is it the other way around?), but use some imagination, have one novel or original idea at least. I am too old for cartoons... which explains why I won't be watching the next Star Trek or fifteen Star Wars coming out. Obviously the director JJ Abrams is specialized in reboots and remakes and sequels and not original ideas.

Similar Movies

5.7
Jurassic World Dominion

Jurassic World Dominion 2022

6.9
Attack

Attack 2022

2.1
The Prototype

The Prototype 2022

5.3
Moonfall

Moonfall 2022

8.7
Maanaadu

Maanaadu 2021

5.7
The Matrix Resurrections

The Matrix Resurrections 2021

5.6
Resident Evil: Welcome to Raccoon City

Resident Evil: Welcome to Raccoon City 2021

6.5
Venom: Let There Be Carnage

Venom: Let There Be Carnage 2021


Share Post

Direct Link

Markdown Link (reddit comments)

HTML (website / blogs)

BBCode (message boards & forums)

Watch Movies Online | Privacy Policy
Fmovies.guru provides links to other sites on the internet and doesn't host any files itself.