Fantastic Four Poster

Fantastic Four (2005)

Action | Fantasy 
Rayting:   5.7/10 312.7K votes
Country: USA | Germany
Language: English
Release date: 14 July 2005

A group of astronauts gain superpowers after a cosmic radiation exposure and must use them to oppose the plans of their enemy, Doctor Victor Von Doom.

Movie Trailer

Where to Watch

  • Buy
  • Buy
  • Subs.
  • Buy

User Reviews

jaemiewaters 22 January 2012

it is a great movie you will like this movie a lot this is a must see movie if you like marvel movies than you will like this movie a lot i never saw a movie this good before it is one of the best PG13 movies i have ever seen you will enjoy this wonderful movie you will say now that is what i call a great movie you just have to go see this masterpiece of a movie it is amazing i like this movie so much this is a 4 out of 4 star movie and a two thumbs up movie it is out of site it hits a home run it is a knockout this is the number 1 marvel movie i have ever seen it is a sweet movie you just have to see this that you will like a lot it is the best PG13 movie i have ever seen i never saw a PG13 movie i like this movie a lot and so will you Fantastic Four is one of the best marvels and one of the best PG13 this is the best movie i have ever seen now go see this wonderful movie this is a movie that you will like a lot it is one of the best PG13 movies i think ever made you just have to go see this movie

nicholls_les 18 July 2016

Fmovies: In my humble opinion this is one of the best Marvel movies I have seen. It just seems to capture the Fantastic Four exactly how I remember them from the comics.

All the main characters Ioan Gruffudd as Reed Richards, Chris Evans as Johnny Storm are pretty much perfect. Jessica Alba as Sue Storm is brilliant and Michael Chiklis as Ben Grimm stands out as just about the perfect 'Thing'.

The only downside for me was Victor Von Doom who just wasn't evil enough and missed what the comics showed him to be.

However I thought the movie was great with some pretty impressive special effects.

randyfromscream 5 August 2017

This movie is very enjoyable like it don't need a dark tone and Dr.Doom looks better. I'd wish I watch the 90s one even though it didn't age well but still I want to. At least the characters are likable then Fant4stic because the characters in the movie are lifeless while in this film there not boring. I know the film is not the best but I have a good time with it

robfollower 5 March 2019

Fantastic Four fmovies. A group of astronauts gain superpowers after a cosmic radiation exposure and must use them to oppose the plans of their enemy, Doctor Victor Von Doom.

It exists largely to entertain and delight, which used to be precisely what summer blockbusters were engineered to do.

write_to_ellen 18 July 2005

This film was well put together, fun, and didn't take itself at all seriously. I am not sure where the negative hype comes from, but I find when a good film gets bad reviews, that means most people just didn't get it. In this case, perhaps from the last few comic book films that attempted to "mean something," I think people forgot how to enjoy themselves. Laden with kitsch and tongue-in-cheek humor, this movie embraces that it comes from a comic book and allows itself to be big and a little silly. Yes, Jessica Alba wears an impossibly tight jumpsuit. Yes, the Human Torch is so slick and charming that, if you met him in real life, he'd get a solid smack for his arrogance. But this isn't real life, people, in case you forgot-this is the Marvel Universe, where clothes are tight and the dialog...isn't. Who cares? This movie is so fun that you wish these people did exist and would take some media focus off the jerks that are in the public eye.

RogerBorg 5 October 2006

In that there are Four of them. But Fantastic? More like "Mediocre", or "Barely Adequate", or "Contractually Sufficient".

For once, the reviewers were right. This film is a big, rambling, poorly conceived, sloppily scripted, shoddily acted pile of orange rubble. Avoid it, or suffer the consequences.

It's hard to know where to begin, there's so much wrong with it. For a start, the acting "talent" is AWOL. TV performers don't inevitably get lost on the big screen, but this cadre evited it. Alba turns in the exact same performance that she always does, going through her entire range, from "pouty and petulant" to "petulant and pouty". Evans is either a strutting superannuated fratboy poseur, or for some reason is deliberately playing one so well that it's hard to tell the difference - either way, his character is thoroughly irritating and utterly unsympathetic. Chiklis is adequate, but is let down by the plain fact that he's a round little man in a big rubber muscle suit. This was a role for Ron Perlman, not Wimpy. Gruffudd is a huge disappointment; he has no screen presence, and his slightly out-of-his-depth portrayal of Hornblower is apparently the man, not the character. It would have been better if he had been invisible, as he manages to fade into the background with ease in every scene. McMahon is the only actor who appears to be enjoying himself, but as he's barely in the film, he can't rescue it.

The script was apparently in development for ten years. I can't see why, as it's one scene, repeated ten times. If this is the refined version, I shudder to imagine what the raw cut would have been like. I find it hard to believe that the lines were written by, or for, adults. There's no real plot to the film, or even a story beyond "Nasty self absorbed un-credible astronauts become nasty self absorbed un-credible 'super' heroes, then argue with each other for a while, take their clothes off for no reason, then beat up some poor disfigured guy apparently because he didn't join their little gang, roll credits." Direction and cinematography was Filmschool #101, the score was instantly forgettable, and the editing was appalling, with the pacing in particular being random and rushed.

The effects were only what we've come to expect from a hundred million dollar movie, which brings me to the big question: what on earth did they spend all that money on? It wasn't on the "talent", either on-screen or off, it certainly wasn't on the rubber suit, and the effects couldn't have cost that much - or if they did, they were seriously over-charged.

I have an idea where at least some of the budget went. From IMDb's Trivia section: "Contains over 25 cameos from real life employees of Fox television affiliates." And I strongly suspect that the IMDb records for this movie contain about 2,5000 comments and ratings and mutual approvals from about five of those real life employees. Reading the top recommended comments, most of which have 10 ratings, reveals a depressing pattern of almost identically styled raves from the likes of "top10dude" and "BigTenPower" with embarrassingly obvious track records of enthusing about, you guessed it, other shoddy Fox movies. When someone rates Elektra a 10, you have to just snort in disbelief at the audacity of it.

I guess it's a pretty good investment for Fox, but this kind of astroturfing d

Similar Movies

8.6
Karthikeya 2

Karthikeya 2 2022

6.2
Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore

Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore 2022

7.0
Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness 2022

6.1
Day Shift

Day Shift 2022

5.5
The Princess

The Princess 2022

6.5
Bimbisara

Bimbisara 2022

8.7
Spider-Man: No Way Home

Spider-Man: No Way Home 2021

6.8
Eternals

Eternals 2021


Share Post

Direct Link

Markdown Link (reddit comments)

HTML (website / blogs)

BBCode (message boards & forums)

Watch Movies Online | Privacy Policy
Fmovies.guru provides links to other sites on the internet and doesn't host any files itself.